merlin:

weselec:

Granted, having a public following can be meaningful for more than social reasons, which a relatively public figure may have, but if you’re there to be social, and that’s largely the way you use the network, what’s the point of leaving the gate open at all?

Is the issue simply that the signal-to-noise when you already reach a large audience is too low to ever be worth wading through?

Good points and a great question.

Read More

Perhaps we should keep the noun form of “social” and replace the adjective with “shared”, as in, “Shared media experts”.  Sharing can be two-way, but it doesn’t have to be.

Source: merlin

234 Notes/ Hide

  1. christopher-kuehl reblogged this from msg
  2. rieglr reblogged this from merlin
  3. msg reblogged this from merlin and added:
    Merlin Mann kung fu grippe: Epilogue